That's A Good Question

Have you ever noticed how many Old Testament prophecies, like Ezekiel's prophetic vision of a future temple, was written as if it was currently happening or happened already?

This is common theological understanding as it is understood that God can easily show a prophet future events from an outside of time perspective where they did already happen.

Put simply, the prophets "past" perspective" hasn't happened yet!

While this is widely understood, then please tell me why they never see that the prophetic description of the downfall of the King of Babylon in Isaiah 13, which is also widely understood to be referencing Satan, is also written from a Future-Past perspective?

In light of an obviously future event where Michael kicks the devil out of heaven in Revelation 12, and then is eventually tossed into the pit for a thousand years in Revelation 20, and the fact that the Isaiah 14 describes this event the same...

Tell me why almost all biblical scholars teach satan fell before the garden?

Tell me also... why do so many believers do not hold that Book higher than the impressive looking men and women who consistently teach error?

Read for yourself!

Study it as it is written!

No, I am not a crackpot. All I do is tell you what it says. Faith in God and His Word is up to God...